The Democrats Are Wrong, Part II: Joe, We Say It Ain't So

Former Vice President and perpetual Presidential candidate Joe Biden is the wrong person to head the Democratic ticket for the 2020 election. Joe keeps harkening back to the good old days in his speeches, constantly referring to his blissful days in the U.S. Senate, where collegiality reigned and compromise was what “got things done”. Joe believes that if we just get rid of Donald Trump the country will return to an era of good manners and good-faith negotiations and… oh, I don’t know, just goodness. America will be America again, and that’s a… wait for it… GOOD thing.

What Joe doesn’t seem to grasp is that this bygone era of gentlemanly courtesy was the product of relationships built between primarily white men of privilege for whom things were always pretty darn good. America was their oyster. There were no impediments placed in their way by our socio-economic system, a system established by, and designed to perpetuate the power of, people like themselves. Of course Joe wants to go back to that time. There were no uncomfortable realities that he and his privileged cohorts couldn’t deal with over a glass of scotch, a cigar, and a schmoozy golf or dinner club date.

I don’t want to unfairly disparage Joe Biden’s record. I don’t deny that he’s usually been on the right side of history in his legislative career. But he hasn’t always been on the right side - and he has demonstrated a particular blind spot when it comes to the plight of women (the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearing and l’Affaire Anita Hill) and people of color. The most recent example of the latter:

Mr. Biden noted that he served with the late Senators James O. Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia, both Democrats who were staunch opponents of desegregation. Mr. Eastland was the powerful chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee when Mr. Biden entered the chamber in 1973.
“I was in a caucus with James O. Eastland,” said Mr. Biden, 76, slipping briefly into a Southern accent, according to a pool report from the fund-raiser. “He never called me ‘boy,’ he always called me ‘son.’”
He called Mr. Talmadge “one of the meanest guys I ever knew, you go down the list of all these guys.”
“Well guess what?” Mr. Biden continued. “At least there was some civility. We got things done. We didn’t agree on much of anything. We got things done. We got it finished. But today you look at the other side and you’re the enemy. Not the opposition, the enemy. We don’t talk to each other anymore.”*
Others have already taken Joe to task for these comments praising segregationists their using polite language when speaking to white men while they defended policies that oppressed black people. “We got things done.” What things? Things that had to do with national defense or highway funding, certainly - you know, the priorities shared by his white male brethren. Things like progressive social legislation and federal enforcement of civil rights laws? Eh, not so much.

“He never called me ‘boy’, he always called me ‘son’”. Of course Senator Eastland never called Joe “boy”. Joe is the “right” color. But I’ll bet he called a lot of black men “boy” during his life. (You see, Joe, as with a lot of other white guys, you have got to learn: It’s not all about you.)

Having said all that, I don’t want this to be an “I hate Biden” screed, because I don’t dislike Joe. But Joe - and the politics and governing style he espouses - is of an earlier, “pre-woke” era. The legitimate grievances of the historically ignored and downtrodden are finally beginning to be addressed by the new wave of representatives winning election (primarily, but not exclusively, on the Democratic side). It isn’t Joe’s physical age that will prevent his nomination. No, it’s the rusty, wheezing, coal-burning engine hauling his outdated political and ethical doctrines that will derail his Presidential express.

Americans don’t need to look to a mythical, “better” past with this next election. If you aren’t yet in a place you want to be, what use is it to say put - or worse, go backward? Only by going forward can we improve our lives - and by our, I mean all of us, together. Joe Biden came of age in a time when politicians had the luxury of being able to ignore the needs of the marginalized in the name of “getting things done”. That’s a luxury the marginalized are no longer willing to afford the elite.
_____________________________________________________
* Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/19/us/politics/biden-segregationists.html

The Democrats Are Wrong, Part I: Impeach, Impeach, Impeach

We, the people of the United States, are enduring the intermediate stage of our most current Constitutional crisis. Intermediate because the crisis began during 2016, long before election day (we just didn't really know it yet). And with each day that the Democratic House leadership puts off impeachment proceedings the US sinks a little bit deeper into the morass created by (and for the benefit of) the Donald Trump regime.

The two dominant themes in the Democratic Party at this moment are: (1) "Just say NO" to impeachment, and (2) "Just say YES" to Joe Biden as the next Democratic candidate for President. Both of these themes are based on cynicism and a misreading of the lessons of recent political history.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has stood firm against impeachment because she believes it would put the Democratic majority at risk in 2020. She doesn't want to be seen as going after Trump for (perceived) purely partisan political reasons, which in her estimation will cause swing voters to abandon centrist Democrats in favor of right-wing Republicans, and cause the Democrats to lose their newly-won house majority. I believe she is wrong, both for practical reasons and, more importantly, for reasons of principle.

The practical: any defections among centrists would likely be negated by renewed enthusiasm from the left for the Democratic Party, who have waited for at least twenty years to see the party leadership grow a spine and actually fight for causes Democrats support. "When they go low, we go high" only works if your opponent hasn't already sliced your Achilles' tendons. (Why Hillary Clinton expressed "regret" for her "deplorables" remark remains a mystery to me.) The Democrats are constantly bringing knives to a gun fight. That's no way to win. But because of decades of misreading the electorate, the Democrats now are faced with the fact that if they are to gain any traction in government, they must overwhelm the Republicans with numbers on election day. The first step toward a wave election is to generate excitement on the part of voters. Weak-kneed politicians unwilling to fight for their base do not generate excitement.

The principle: the entire purpose of Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution is to remove people like Trump from government.
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Robert Mueller concluded that Donald Trump did commit impeachable offenses; he just couldn't say so under the rules he was forced to work under - rules imposed by people who work for Donald Trump. Nancy Pelosi doesn't merely have the right to pursue impeachment, she has an obligation to do so, an obligation she accepted upon taking her oath of office and assuming the Speakership. Whether or not it hurts her party at the ballot box in 2020 she has a responsibility to the country to begin proceedings to remove Donald Trump from the office he has demeaned and abused for three years.

Next: why we shouldn't want Joe Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.

An Explanation

I had taken a hiatus from my original blog because - well, because of life, really; and because I have never had the discipline to force myself to write on a regular basis to keep the blog fresh. Writing, like any other creative endeavor, is work for me, and requires a great deal of time and effort, and an environment conducive to thinking. My current job affords me the opportunity to put aside a little time in an appropriate environment; now, I am applying some effort, and hopefully I will be able to communicate a few of my thoughts.

There is an urgency to my need to write. I have always been unnaturally aware of my own mortality - unnaturally, I say, because I was one of those odd children who thought about death far too often for a healthy mind. With each year that passes I feel an increase in the pressure to write before I lose the ability to do so.

Thus, virtual pen to virtual paper... and off we go.